Juno vs macOS Shortcuts
AI that sees your screen vs Apple's built-in automation framework.
macOS Shortcuts (formerly Automator) is Apple's built-in automation tool. It's free, well-integrated, and works with Siri. But it's limited to predefined actions from apps that support the Shortcuts framework.
Juno uses AI vision to interact with any app — even ones that don't have Shortcuts support. It sees your screen and operates the mouse and keyboard like a human would.
| Feature | Juno | macOS Shortcuts |
|---|---|---|
| Works with any app | Yes (screen-based) | Only Shortcuts-compatible apps |
| Built into macOS | No (download required) | Yes |
| Natural language input | Yes | Limited (Siri integration) |
| Voice activation | "Hey Juno" + full task | "Hey Siri" + simple commands |
| Complex multi-step tasks | Yes (AI figures out steps) | You must build each step |
| Free | Free (API costs for AI) | Free |
| Privacy | Screenshots sent to API | Fully local |
| Reliability | AI may take different paths | Deterministic |
When to use Shortcuts
- Simple, system-level automations (toggle settings, open apps, send messages)
- Tasks that work with Shortcuts-compatible apps
- When you need fully local/private execution
- Quick one-action triggers via Siri
When to use Juno
- Complex tasks involving multiple apps that don't support Shortcuts
- Tasks requiring visual understanding ("find the button that says X")
- Research, comparison, and judgment-based tasks
- When you'd rather describe the task than build a workflow
A note on privacy
Shortcuts runs entirely on-device. Juno sends screenshots to Anthropic's API for processing. If your task involves sensitive data and you need full local execution, Shortcuts is the safer choice. For everything else, Juno's AI-powered flexibility is hard to match.
Go beyond what Shortcuts can do.
Try Juno Free